|
Contributors
Charles Kopp - Contributor
Charles
Kopp is a graduate of the New School for Social Research.
He is a composer and musician, and an ardent lover of poetry.
He has been a teacher and a systems analyst. In Lafayette,
California, he now designs websites and works on creative
projects. He can be contacted at charleskopp@earthlink.net [go
to Kopp index]
Slander
as Politics
The Democrats' Poisonous New Approach...
[Charles Kopp] 3/25/04
Democratic critics of our President are daily making slanderous
charges without an iota of proof. They seem to have no other
campaign strategy at this point. One could spend the time to
name them, but the list has grown so long as to be unwieldy.
Certainly Senators Kennedy, Daschle, and Boxer are on the list.
Ex-President Clinton. Saddest is the case of President Carter,
who -- though an ineffective President -- could at least hitherto
have claimed to be an honest and decent man.
The game, it seems, is to make any unsupported accusation that
might serve to influence some voters. They have said Bush was
AWOL during his Air Guard service. They have said that in Texas
Bush dreamed up the idea having an unnecessary war, either to
promote his election effort or to obtain oil (both goals which
could have been more easily without a war). No proof is offered.
It is apparently enough that Mr. Kennedy believes it, or says
he believes it in a loud voice. Kennedy will never be famous
for courage or good judgment, but it still remained within his
power to be a true elder statesman, had he behaved responsibly
for a few consecutive years. Unfortunately, the challenge must
have been too great.
Public figures
cannot sue for libel, because this might harm open discussion
among
a free people. But it is a new thing, arising
during my lifetime, to accuse a candidate of felonious and treasonous
actions without even one memo, one witness, one scrap of evidence,
purely in hope of driving polling negatives upward for one’s
opponent. It is especially new, that senior politicians who ought
to be aware of the harm this does to our nation should proceed
with behavior so reckless and irresponsible.
It is an
easy game to play. I could play it. I could say: Senator Kerry
did not
deserve his medals, having hardly been injured
and perhaps not by enemy fire, and far from being a hero took
a clever and quick way out of Vietnam. It might be true; his
medical records are sealed. I can’t prove it, but I can
shout it if I want to do that.
Other similar
ideas come to mind. How did his first wife die, again? Where
is the
proof? What about all those IRS tax returns
he keeps hiding? Was he really in the room, when assassination
of American officials was discussed by the Vietnam Veterans Against
the War? Isn’t such a conversation itself a violation of
the law? Whose military medals did he throw over that fence?
This game is causing daily harm to my country. If any of these
senior Democratic figures have any patriotism whatsoever, they
must stop this poisonous and irresponsible behavior. They can
say it was wrong to attack Iraq, and they can say what they would
have done about the danger of terrorism. But they cannot be decent
American citizens and say Bush started a war and got hundreds
of soldiers killed to improve his electability, not without offering
evidence. Such a thing would be a serious crime, and we have
grand juries and prosecutors to handle evidence of such things.
I can remember the Kennedy-Nixon debates; a different time and
a different Kennedy. They disagreed. They accused one another
of being mistaken. They each claimed the country would be better
off with their own particular policies. Neither said the other
was guilty of criminal acts of treason and deception.
Democrats
today love to evoke the memory of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
I wish I felt
some hope that today’s Democrats
were capable of honor, of honesty. Failing these moral heights,
could they manage to live day to day without making slanderous
accusations without even a single shred of actual evidence?
I doubt it.
But I’d
love to be proven wrong. I really would. CRO
copyright
2004 Charles Kopp
§
|