|
|

Latest Column:
Stopping
the Meltdown
What Beltway Republicans Need To Do
..........

CaliforniaRepublic.org
opinon in
Reagan country
..........

..........

Jon
Fleischman’s
FlashReport
The premier source for
California political news
..........

Michael
Ramirez
editorial cartoon
@Investor's
Business
Daily
..........
Do
your part to do right by our troops.
They did the right thing for you.
Donate Today

..........
..........

..........

tOR Talk Radio
Contributor Sites
Laura
Ingraham
Hugh
Hewitt
Eric
Hogue
Sharon
Hughes
Frank
Pastore
[Radio Home]
..........
|
|
Making "Men
Without Chests"
Courage becomes unfashionable...
[by
Richard Kirk] 4/13/06
“And
for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance
on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge
to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.” Thus
ends America’s Declaration of Independence—a document that
cost most of its fifty-six signers dearly in terms of blood
and treasure.
Elite opinion today finds such statements of
commitment undiplomatic and imprudent—quaint
relics from a bygone era when goals other than
comfort and self-fulfillment stood at the apex
of human aspiration.
In similar fashion contemporary commentators view military service as a
barbaric enterprise pursued by individuals with few employment options
and limited intellectual firepower. What does it profit someone, they reason,
to risk life and limb for the sake of ideals that are subject to deconstruction
and ridicule by the likes of themselves? Instead of throwing it all away,
these dupes could have pursued a Lexus-load of pleasurable alternatives.
Put
succinctly, among the secular literati courage is a
virtue that has fallen out of fashion. In its place
stand avant-garde cynicism, rhetorical
cleverness, and a passion for artistic refinement. Maureen Dowd is their
cup of tea, not General Patton.
This shift is understandable. After all, if life has no higher purpose,
if ideals are only tarted up neuroses, if patriotism is a mendacious veil
for narrow economic interests —then no reasonable person would give up
a chance for happiness, short as it may be, for a vocation whose risks
are great and whose rewards are largely intangible.
Moreover, most men and women aren’t going to forfeit their lives
for the sake of a society that fervently proclaims the necessity
of doing your
own thing. Nor will they practice self-denial within a culture whose primary
philosophical images are those of randomness, materialism, and ultimate
extinction.
Over half a century ago C. S. Lewis criticized academics whose
disdain for martial endeavors resulted in curricula designed to
produce “men without
chests” —i.e. persons lacking those noble sentiments associated with, among
other traits, bravery and self-sacrifice. Since that time the intellectual
landscape has shifted more dramatically in favor of those who “laugh at
virtue” and mock patriotism.
When I look at the clash of civilizations that is taking place
today, I wonder how long the West can continue to draw on accounts
that, in intellectual
circles, have long been closed. The phrase “sacred honor” is more likely
to produce a guffaw among the pen-wielding set than to promote a series
of sacrificial acts. As for “Divine Providence,” this idea has been dismissed
by smarter-than-thous—for the sake of human autonomy.
Unfortunately, freedom without a moral context amounts to little
more than self-indulgence. And self-indulgence isn’t a medium within
which courage thrives.
A decadent culture, it appears, sows the seeds of
its own destruction.ONE
copyright
2005 Richard Kirk
|
|
|