|
a
running commentary by our trusted contributors...
[6/30/04
Wednesday]
[Carol
Platt Liebau - editorial director CaliforniaRepublic.org]
5:09 am [link]
Take Back: Yesterday, at a rally for Senator
Barbara Boxer in San Francisco, Hillary Clinton announced:
"Many
of you are well enough off that . . . the tax cuts may have
helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track,
we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you.
We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common
good."
Here are
some questions for Senator Boxer:
(1) Does
she agree with Hillary Clinton that tax cuts are something
that the government "gives" to the people? Does the
money belong to the government -- so that it's a gift when
taxes are cut, or does tax money belong to the people who pay
taxes from what they have earned?
(2) Does
she believe that the American people are children, who need
to have their own money "taken away" from them by
the likes of her and Hillary Clinton? Does she believe in Hillary
Clinton's formulation that it's a good thing for government
to "take away" some things from some people in order
to fulfill certain officials' vision of what constitutes "the
common good"? And how does she define "the common
good" anyway?
An absolutely
ridiculous and outrageous quote.
[Gordon
Cucullu - author, columnist] 5:15
am [link]
Dog
Pack As
excellent columnist and scholar Daniel Pipes notes
below, diplomatic ties between the PLO and North Koreans
are progressing beyond the point of buying each other flowers.
This behavior is amusing at the level of stray dogs sniffing
respective hind ends, but worrisome when one considers
that one of the dogs is manufacturing dirty weapons or
full up nuclear bombs and the other is insane enough to
use them. We Americans have a culture that likes to categorize
people and organizations and assign exclusivity to each
category. In other words if someone is a North Korean terrorist
we would automatically think that person would not necessarily
interact with an Islamic fascist. The reality is that they
are working frantically together to hurt us. As the stakes
grow larger we must pay more attention to these connections,
as Pipes so accurately points out. We cannot afford to
allow ourselves to miss a critical threat simply because
it is out of the analytical box of our cultural norms.
These terrorists of all kinds have joined like a pack of
dogs. And they are looking hungrily at the West.
[6/29/04
Tuesday]
[Carol
Platt Liebau - editorial
director CaliforniaRepublic.org] 7:02 pm [link]
Handover: Congratulations
to the Iraqis and to all the brave Coalition forces and leaders
who made this moment possible! Not only has sovereignty been
restored to the Iraq, but those who would have marred the handover
with terrorism have been thwarted. Let's all say a prayer for
Iraq, its people and its future.
Finally .
. . can the press get over Vice President Cheney saying the "f-word" to
Patrick Leahy? The word came out in a private conversation
that was leaked to the press by Leahy or someone on his staff
(and remember -- Leahy has a "leaking" problem .
. . recall when he leaked classified Intelligence Committee
info to the press back in the late '80's?). The expletive wasn't
being used for publication by a struggling candidate to create
a macho effect, a la John Kerry in Rolling Stone. It was an
honest man objecting to attacks on his integrity by a human
weasel. Enough said.
[Daniel
Pipes - author, activist CRO contributor] 5:02
am [link]
Palestinian Flowers to "Leader Kim Jong Il" For years, I have
a low-key interest in the Palestinian "diplomatic" representation abroad,
that ambitious effort to endow first a terrorist group (the PLO) and then a terrorist
authority (the PA) with the trappings of a legitimate state. I reported on one
personal encounter in 1993, "Dining
out with the PLO in Prague," where I noted "two oddities: that
the PLO should reach out to someone like me and that it should host such an elegant
and thoroughly bourgeois dinner party."
The news
from Pyongyang, included the riveting fact that "Leader
Kim Jong Il received floral baskets and congratulatory letters
from the diplomatic corps and officials in charge of the
cultural and friendly relations of foreign embassies here
on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of his start of work
at the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea." Of
particular note is that "The floral basket and congratulatory
letter from the diplomatic corps here were conveyed to Foreign
Minister Paek Nam Sun by Palestinian Ambassador E. P. Shaher
Mohammed Abdlah who is doyen of the corps." How reassuring
to learn that things
may be an anarchic shambles at home, but in North Korea,
the Palestinian pretence to constitute a state is proceeding
ahead as ever.
[6/28/04
Monday]
[Eric
Hogue
- radio talk show host KTKZ -
Sacramento] 5:03 am [link]
Beheading
Everyone: Hearing reports that a US Marine has been taken captive by
terrorists and they are threatening to behead him unless the US and Iraq government
release prisoners
had me wondering if the elite media might change their tune.
So, should
we treat these prisoners as POW’s according to the Geneva
Convention rules? Or should we treat them as enemy combatants,
being as tough as morally possible to get as much information
out of them before another innocent human being is beheaded
by Army of Islam slime.
Let’s
review - we have three Turkish captives, one Pakistan captive
and now a US Marine, held by the terrorists in Iraq and Saudi
Arabia. They want PRISONERS that we have in PRISON freed -
I'll say again - they want their evil brethren released
or they will cut the heads off of innocent people. Do
you think those we are holding in prison are simple POW’s
or are they members of terrorism?
[Streetsweeper
- into the opinion bin]
5:02 am [link]
What
radical liberal judiciary? The NY
Times mentions a Clinton appointee
to
the
2nd
Circuit, "In a way that occurred before but is rare in the United States,
somebody came to power as a result of the illegitimate acts of a legitimate institution
that had
the right to put somebody in power," Judge [Guido] Calabresi told an annual
meeting of the American Constitution Society in Washington on Saturday, in remarks
that were first reported by The New York Sun. "That is what the Supreme
Court did in Bush v. Gore; it put somebody in power," he said, referring
to the decision that cleared the way for Mr. Bush to claim victory in the election.
// "The reason I emphasize that is because that is exactly what happened
when Mussolini was put in by the king of Italy," he said. "That is
what happened when Hindenburg put Hitler in." Oh, yeah... What about the
Florida Supreme Court that wrote new law to make sure that their guy Mr. Gore
would squeak by? So, bouncing out that kind of radical liberal judicary high-handedness
is equivalent to a fascistic grab for power? Hmmm... I wonder how his rulings
read? Probably not a whole lot different from our state’s lovely Stephen
Reinhardt’s on the 9th, eh?
[6/25/04
Friday]
[Bill
Leonard, contributor, Member CA Board of Equalization] 5:13
am [link]
Mississippi Bests California: Last week the Wall
Street Journal ran an
article describing Mississippi’s move out of the bottom slot for having
the worst business climate in the U.S. The article attributed this jump to the
state’s embrace of tort reform. The bad news for us is that for the past
several years, business magazines have listed California and Mississippi as having
the worst, or second-worst, business climates in the nation. Well, it appears
because of Mississippi’s reforms, California now has a virtual lock on
being the very worst. Yes, things seem to be getting a little better for Californians
as the economy improves. Nonetheless, all of us elected officials need to keep
this ignominious distinction in the front of our minds and get to work.
I never cease
to be amazed by the number of Democrat policymakers who ignore
the ranking of states. They really do not believe that businesspeople
make decisions based on public policy. They should all give
ear to something Senator Dick Ackerman reported this week.
He met with HP’s CEO, Carly Fiorina, recently. She told
him that she gives her corporate officers this direction about
how they should determine business expansion opportunities
or relocation decisions: anywhere but Germany, France or California.
That is not a list that we should be on.
[6/24/04
Thursday]
[Chuck
DeVore - columnist] 5:02
am [link]
Michael Moore’s Islamofascist Propaganda Machine: Premise - Mr. Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11 plumbs new depths of national
self-loathing (he is an American, isn’t he?) and provides aid and
comfort to the
enemy.
As honest
leftist Christopher Hitchens puts it, “To describe this
film as dishonest and demagogic would almost be to promote
those terms to the level of respectability… Fahrenheit
9/11 is a sinister exercise in moral frivolity, crudely
disguised as an exercise in seriousness. It is also a spectacle
of abject political cowardice masking itself as a demonstration
of ‘dissenting’ bravery.” (See: Slate)
Mr. Hitchens
goes on to suggest that Mr. Moore has the “…filmic
standards, if not exactly the filmic skills, of Sergei Eisenstein
or Leni Riefenstahl.”
This got
me to thinking. Leni Riefenstahl. The infamously brilliant
German filmmaker, who, at 33, made the notorious Triumph of
the Will in 1935 – a “documentary” that promoted
Hitler’s new Germany. Perhaps Moore isn’t engaged
in self-loathing. Maybe he really is an agent for the Islamofascists
who seek to impose a new world order, complete with public
beheadings and progressive attitudes towards polygamy.
We now find
out that Hezbollah (the terrorist group, not the movie distributor),
wants to boost Fahrenheit 9/11 in the Middle East. Mr. Gianluca
Chacra, the Managing Director of Mr. Moore’s film distributor,
Front Row, said of Hezbollah, “We can't go against these
organizations, as they could strongly boycott the film in Lebanon
and Syria.”
Michael Moore:
useful idiot, shameless self-promoter, or Islamofascist agent – you
decide.
In the meantime,
one emerging reason for undecided voters to reelect President
Bush is that Mr. Kerry’s defeat would spare us all from
the inevitable Michael Moore “documentary” of Kerry’s
life. ]Chuck DeVore is the Republican nominee in California's
70th Assembly District. www.ChuckDeVore.com]
[6/23/04
Wednesday]
[Gordon
Cucullu - author, columnist] 5:15
am [link]
Selective Torture. Why
is it that mainstream media finds no news value in a recently-released
four-minute compilation that the Pentagon assembled from hours of video
recovered from Saddam Hussein's torture chambers? Meanwhile, they gleefully
re-run Abu Ghraib tapes until viewers' eyes glaze. Also the media threatens
to run 'newly uncovered, even more horrible' tapes of American abuse but
will ignore a Senate screening of some of the most horrific torture film
seen. Nick
Schultz in an excellent piece carried on NRO details the scenes
from pre-liberation Iraq. It is a must-read column.
The important
question- is the American public being intentionally isolated
from film that may remind us of why we are fighting the war
on terror? The media sanctimoniously decided that shots of
the poor souls flinging themselves from the burning WTC buildings
are too intense for us to see. Also up close video of Daniel
Pearl's murder, Michael Berg's beheading, and Paul Johnson's
beheading are, like Saddam video, too graphic for our sensitive
eyes in their opinion. I challenge that premise: if American
troops were commiting these atrocities they would show it to
us. Repeatedly. Ad nauseum. Instead the press has become so
politicized and bent on destroying George W. Bush that it would
distort through the censorship of selective omission.
It behooves
us all to make certain that the word on this egregious Saddam
tape is spread. Even if the public can't see it they can read
about it, though as the NYT reporter said so sanctimoniously
about Abu Ghraib, 'you really can't appreciate the horror of
the event until you see it.' So show us what life was like
in Saddam's prison, people. We're big kids and can handle it.
[6/22/04
Tuesday]
[Daniel
Pipes - author, activist CRO contributor] 5:54
am [link]
Insane
Asylum: How America Welcomes Terrorists. Among
Michelle Malkin's many virtues as a columnist is her keeping
tabs of patterns
that the rest of us might have missed. In a column last
week she notes a particularly distressing one: immigrants
claiming "political
asylum" who are later accused or indicted on terrorism
charges. She points to four instances:
Ramzi
Yousef: He arrived from Pakistan with an Iraqi passport
but no U.S. visa. Claiming political asylum, he was briefly detained
for illegal entry, then allowed to enter the United States because
the immigration authorities lacked space to hold him. Yousef
went on to plot the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, for which
he now sits convicted in a U.S. jail.
Mir Aimal
Kansi: A Pakistani who received a business visa in 1991
to enter the United
States, despite his known history as
an Islamist. After arrival, he claimed political asylum based
on his ethnic minority status in Pakistan. He obtained a driver's
license and an AK-47, then went on a murderous rampage outside
the CIA headquarters in January 1993, killing two employees
and wounded three others. He was convicted in 1997 of capital
murder
and nine other charges, for which he now sits convicted in
a U.S. jail.
Gazi
Ibrahim Abu Mezer: A Palestinian who entered the United
States illegally from Canada in about 1996, claiming
political
asylum based on alleged persecution by Israel. Released on
a $5,000 bond (posted by a another illegal alien), he skipped
his
asylum hearing. In June 1997, a federal immigration judge
ordered Mezer to leave the country on a "voluntary departure
order," which
Mezer ignored. He was arrested in July 1997 as he
was about to bomb the New York City subways, for which he now sits
convicted in a U.S. jail.
Nuradin
M. Abdi: A Somali, whom prosecutors allege received
a bogus "refugee" status in 1999, then fraudulently
obtained a refugee travel document which he used to fly to
Ethiopia for Al-Qaeda's jihad training. On returning he began
plotting
to blow up a shopping mall in Ohio, for which he now sits
accused in a U.S. jail.
In addition, here are more "political asylum" immigrants
whom Malkin does not mention but who fit the same pattern:
Omar
Abdel Rahman: The blind Egyptian sheikh who, although
already on a terrorism "watch list" when
he arrived in the United States, nevertheless acquired a tourist
visa and
then permanent residency. When it was understood who he was,
this was revoked and Abdel Rahman applied
for political asylum.
He was allowed to remain while his application was being considered,
which time he used to guide his disciples who blew up the World
Trade Center in 1993 and then plotted to blow up New York City
landmarks in 1995; he now sits convicted in a U.S. jail for the
latter offense.
Hesham
Mohamed Ali Hedayet: An
Egyptian who entered the United
States as a tourist in 1992, he then applied for
political asylum,
claiming discrimination on account of his religious beliefs – shorthand
for being an Islamist, indeed a member of al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya
("the Islamic Group"), a group engaged in terrorism
since 1981 and listed in the State Department's 1992 edition
of Patterns of Global Terrorism. The immigration authorities
ruled against his asylum application in March 1995 and formally
began the deportation procedures but Hedayet disappeared. In
July 2002, Hedayet engaged in a shooting spree against the
El Al counter at Los Angeles International Airport, killing
two
before being shot dead himself.
There are
also related cases, for example that of
Nasser
Ahmed: An Egyptian associate of Omar Abdel Rahman who applied for
political asylum in 1996, spent
three years in American
jail on charges kept secret for reasons with "national
security implications," and then set free.
As Malkin sardonically puts it, "The feds
deserve credit for tracking down asylum abusers suspected of
terrorism. But
homeland security would be easier to achieve if they did a better
job of keeping murderous frauds out in the first place."
[6/21/04
Monday]
[Gordon
Cucullu - author, columnist] 11:55
am [link]
Thoughts on
the Korean hostage situation: Chances of rescue or survival are unfortunately very
slim.
Expect street
protests in Seoul, particularly among students, for removal
of all South Koreans from Iraq and against dispatching the
3,000 troops later in the summer.
North Korea
will issue condemnatory language, especially designed to divide
South Korea and the US.
My call is
that after much wavering the South Korean Roh Moo Hyun
administration will end up sending the troops. They may cut back the 3,000
to a smaller number in order to offer a concession to their audience. It will
require much diplomacy and probably some quiet inducements on the part of the
US.
The South
Korean leadership is not enthusiastic about commiting troops
to Iraq and is vulnerable to criticism from the left since
that is its support base. This is very different leadership
than that of previous decades that stood shoulder to shoulder
with the US in tough times.
Expect that
all foreigners in Arab countries will be targeted from here
on out in order to break the US public and allied will. This
is not an attack directed against individuals for the sake
of killing them it is a psychological warfare attack directed
against the morale of populations, especially the US in the
midst of a heated election season. We must hold firm, refuse
to negotiate and actively hunt down and kill these barbarians.
All the best,
and let us pray for these poor hostages.
[Streetsweeper
- into the opinion bin] 5:02 am [link]
Memo
to the NY Times & LA Times
Here is the proper form for your lying, weasely
headlines:
Panel Finds No
Qaeda-Iraq Tie (uh,
at least in 9-11 attack)
[Carol
Platt Liebau - editorial
director CaliforniaRepublic.org] 5:02 am [link]
On Clinton: Last
night's "60 Minutes" broadcast
served to remind Americans why we are so well-served to have Bill Clinton
out of the White House. The entire interview was little more than a prolonged
exercise in "spin," from a pitiful ex-President who has realized
that, without some significant burnishing, his presidency is likely to
go down in history as the Harding administration of 20th century's second
half.
Interestingly,
Clinton denied that the Sudan had ever offered Osama bin Laden
to his administration, despite the existence of a speech where
he, himself, admitted as much! (Not surprisingly, Dan Rather
didn't bring up that inconvenient fact). Nor was Clinton asked
why UN support was unnecessary, from his party's perspective,
for our involvement in the Balkans, but a vital precursor to
liberating Iraq.
But there
was plenty on the defining event of the Clinton years: the
Monica Lewinsky matter. Here's one questionj that could have
been asked: "Without the discovery of the infamous blue
dress, do you think you would ever have admitted to improper
behavior with Miss Lewinsky?" (Don't forget, all the president's
underlings in this supposedly "woman friendly" administration
were getting ready to cast Monica as a psychopathic stalker).
In between
telling us a lot of other things we really didn't need to know,
Clinton asserted that he and his wife had attended a full day
of marital counseling for a year after his affair with Monical
Lewinsky was "discovered." That admission, in itself,
explains why "character counts." The President of
the United States (#42) is spending 1/7 of his time in marital
counseling -- and the liberals used to fume about President
Reagan allegedly taking the occasional nap!
Overall,
it was simply sad to see how little insight the former President
has -- either about himself or his adversaries. He is simply
a faulty, mistreated but brilliant President; they are intractable
enemies of the wonderful "change" the Clinton years
brought about (like what? welfare reform?). And once again,
impeachment wasn't about him perjuring himself . . . it was
just about sex. He's proud, yes, proud of how he handled the
entire matter.
Good luck
rewriting history, Mr. Clinton. We remember. We were there.
[Eric
Hogue
- radio talk show host KTKZ -
Sacramento] 5:01 am [link]
Bush
Economy
in California: Jobs
up. California’s economy created 23,600 payroll jobs in May. It now has
110,200 more payroll jobs than a year ago. (Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,
seasonally adjusted, 6/18/04)
California’s
economy is adding good-paying jobs. Three quarters (74%) of
California’s gross payroll job growth in May was in industries
that pay more than the national average. For example, the information
industry comprised 23% of the gross job growth. The average
hourly pay of a non-supervisory job in that industry is $21.40.
That’s well above the national average for all non-supervisory
jobs of $15.64 per hour. (Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics)
Unemployment
down. California’s unemployment rate dropped to 6.2%
from 6.8% a year ago. The national average is 5.6%. California’s
average unemployment rate in the 1990s was 7.3%. (Source: U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, seasonally adjusted, 6/18/04)
Personal
incomes swell. California personal incomes increased 1.4% to
$1.2 trillion during the fourth quarter of 2003. On a per capita
basis, personal incomes increased $760 to $33,749 last year.
(Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 4/27/04)
Housing values
increase. California housing values increased 13.9% in the
past year. Over the last five years, home values have risen
by 77.0%. (Source: U.S. Office of Federal Housing Enterprise
Oversight, 6/1/04)
More exports.
California exported $27.1 billion in goods and services in
the first three months of 2004. That’s 25% more than
a year ago. (Source: Office of Trade and Economic Analysis,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 5/18/04)
Insourcing
jobs. Over 713,500 jobs are ”nsourced” to California
from companies based in other countries. About 11.1% of all
manufacturing jobs in State are with foreign companies. (Source: “Survey
of Current Business,” U.S Department of Commerce, 8/02)
Revenues
on the rise. Total state tax collections in California, adjusted
for legislation and inflation, increased by 9.5% in March from
the same period a year ago (Source: “State Tax Revenue
Recovery Gathering Steam,” Fiscal Studies Program: The
Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, 6/04)
[6/18/04
Friday]
[Gordon
Cucullu - author, columnist] 5:14
am [link]
The
Gipper Effect: Did anyone else notice that suddenly
George W. Bush seems to have regained his poise, confidence
and steely eye? Could it have been the very timely exposure
to All Things Reagan? In my column A
Bright Dawn Ahead, I
wondered what possible affects that Ronald Reagan's death
could have. My hope continues to be that GWB and those around
him will simply have the faith and confidence to be themselves,
rely on their innate sense of what is morally right for the
country, and stay the course. If I were filming ads I'd like
to see one of RR giving one of his famous 'we must stay the
course' speeches in discussing the USSR then juxtapose it
with GWB saying 'we must win this war on terror.' I think
it would be extremely effective and point out the real differences
in this campaign. Not health care, not Social Security, not
jobs and the economy, but the very core security and safety
of this nation. Such a sacred mission cannot be entrusted
to anyone but the legitimate successor of Ronald Reagan -
George W. Bush.
[6/17/04
Thursday]
[Gordon
Cucullu - author, columnist] 7:24
am [link]
Clueless in
America: Wednesday evening I attended a book signing in NYC for Endgame,
by Generals Paul Vallely and Tom McInerney. Both spoke about the 'Web of
Terror' that they outline in this excellent book. One of the most chilling
points the generals raised is their nightmare scenario of 5 to 10 nuclear
weapons - ground or sea delivered - exploding virtually simultaneously
in American cities. With North Korea beavering away at its nuclear program
and Iran thumbing its nose at the UN the specter of Islamo-fascist groups
acquiring these bombs seems increasingly possible. Their point is that
America must wake up and realize that September 11 was not an aberration
but part of a pattern of war on the US. Second that this is war, not crime,
and third that we must act swiftly and as the world leader we are in order
to eliminate the threat. I am heartened by presentations by the President
and Vice President in the past few days but we need more of it. The media
is reporting only what it perceives as news that fits its political agenda.
In this case a clueless America equals a helpless America. We must all
work to educate our audience.
[6/16/04
Wednesday]
[Carol
Platt Liebau - editorial
director CaliforniaRepublic.org] 5:17 am [link]
A Selective Media: The New York Post's invaluable Deborah
Orin has a piece today
reporting that more horrific films from Abu Ghraib have been released --
but strangely, the media isn't interested. Perhaps it's because the films
detail stomach-churning torture -- not by Americans -- but by Saddam Hussein.
From Orin's description, it sounds like these films makes the (admittedly
appalling) behavior by some U.S. troops look like spirited hijinks by comparison.
Perhaps we ought to turn to Teddy Kennedy for comment . . . he's the one
who seems to think that the unauthorized ill-treatment by American troops
has the moral equivalency of the Saddamite regime's official policy of
barbarous torture and mutilation. Will the New York or Los Angeles Times
bother to cover the Saddam torture tapes? Don't hold your breath -- we'd
better count on the blogosphere and other "fair and balanced" outlets
to make sure the American people get the rest of the story.
[Bill
Leonard, contributor,
Member CA Board of Equalization] 5:13 am [link]
Our
Governor’s Faith: One
of the most touching aspect of honoring Ronald Reagan last week was seeing and
hearing how many public officials react to matters of faith. Those for whom faith
is a motivating factor in their lives put the spiritual touches on their decisions
and actions every day, but unless one is looking for it, that inspired leadership
may go unnoticed. As Governor Schwarzenegger addressed the California Prayer
Breakfast last Wednesday, it was impossible for his faith to remain unnoticed.
I want to share with you some of the words he spoke at the breakfast to let you
know that in addition to a man of action, you have a man of faith leading our
state. He remembered his experience being raised Catholic and attending church
schools. He said,
“All
of those things had a big impact on me growing up. I learned
faith and discipline from the church, but I also learned faith
and discipline from my parents. My parents did not allow me
to just hang out, or to just watch things be done. They wanted
me to be responsible, always be active. My father, especially,
always was asking me, every day, ‘What were you doing
today? What did you accomplish?’ ….It didn’t
matter really what it was, he just wanted me to create something,
build something, invent something, or do something. It didn’t
matter what it was, if it was just building a little whistle
from a wood stick, or if it was studying, creating a kite from
scratch, or going to school, or doing homework, or doing sports… He
wanted me to be active, and to grow and develop myself, because
he wanted me to have faith in God, but he also wanted me to
have faith in myself. He always said it was God who gave me
my body and my mind, but it was now up to me to achieve 100
percent of my potential. And he always would say it’s
criminal for people not to achieve 100 percent of their potential.”
The Governor
did not go on to talk about achieving his potential in terms
of his political work. Rather, he focused on instilling the
same values in his children. He spoke highly of his wife and
her abilities as well as of her parents and their faith. He
talked about teaching his own children to read the Bible daily,
do well in school, complete their chores and be physically
active. In doing all of that, our Governor gives an example
of faith in action and reminds us that we uplift each other
in our efforts to reach our divine potential. [Leonard
Letter]
[6/15/04
Tuesday]
[Bill
Leonard, contributor, Member CA Board of Equalization] 5:05
am [link]
Honoring Ronald Reagan: I
did not have a better idea than Governor Schwarzenegger's Proclamation to honor
Ronald Reagan, which reduced state offices to skeleton crews last Friday. However,
I must admit that to honor a President and Governor who railed against waste
in government by paying government workers for extra time off is, at the very
least, ironic.
My second
thought was remembering my father's advice to Governor Reagan
when he served as a Reagan appointee to the California Highway
Commission. Dad said that Cal Trans would probably get more
transportation projects built if half the department was sent
home with pay. Perhaps Governor Schwarzengger, with thanks
to Ronald Reagan, is belatedly implementing this advice.
My third
thought was also not mine originally. A thoughtful commentator
on the state budget suggested that Governor Schwarzenegger,
again with a nod to Ronald Reagan, has found a way for state
employees to self- identify themselves as either "essential," which
means that they worked last Friday, or "non-essential," which
means they may end up on that layoff list now buried in the
Department of Finance. [Leonard
Letter]
[6/14/04
Monday]
[Patterico
- CRO contributor & blogger] 5:35
am [link]
Dem
Times: Yesterday's Los Angeles Times coverage of
an anti-Bush letter signed by 26 former diplomats gets Page One treatment.
Facts showing that the signatories are partisan Democrats are buried on the
back pages. Meanwhile, where was the L.A. Times story when John Kerry's
entire chain of command in Vietnam signed a letter questioning his honesty
and fitness to serve as Commander-in-Chief? I'll tell you where: page A21.
The post is here...
I won't provide the entire text, which is long, but here are the first two
paragraphs, so you can see whether you might be interested in the rest:
Bias doesn't
get much clearer than this. The lead story in today's Los
Angeles Times trumpets a letter, written by 26 former
diplomats, calling for the defeat of President George W.
Bush. On the front page, the story goes out of its way to
suggest that the letter is a bipartisan effort. The editors
save for the back pages (or entirely omit) significant evidence
suggesting that the signatories are partisan Democrats. Not
one word of the Bush perspective appears on the front page.
It's all on page A26, safely out of the view of the average
reader.
The L.A.
Times's prominent and sympathetic treatment of this
letter stands in marked contrast to its coverage of a letter
that was released in May by hundreds of former military
men, many of whom served with John Kerry, questioning Kerry's
honesty and fitness to serve as Commander-in-Chief. The
letter, which was signed by every officer in Kerry's chain
of command in Vietnam, was buried by the L.A. Times in
stories appearing on pages A21 and A20. In the little coverage
the paper did provide, the stories ignored the central
accusations of the letter, and gave prominent play to the
spin that the letter was a partisan hit job.
[6/11/04
Friday]
[Senator
Tom McClintock]
5:07 am [link]
Tribute to Ronald Reagan:Perhaps only one
generation in four is fortunate enough to actually know a truly
great leader – and ours
was that generation. That’s a reason for thanksgiving and gratitude and
celebration. But our children and their children will know him too, through the
power of his words and the force of his ideas – his boundless faith in
freedom and belief in America. And they will know because our generation will
make sure they know.
This is not
an end of an era – Ronald Reagan marked the beginning
of an era – an era of American renaissance and resurgence – an
era where America rediscovered its belief in liberty and its
faith in its ultimate destiny. Ronald Reagan opened that era;
it is now for our generation to continue it.
Ronald Reagan
can only die if he is forgotten. Every flower left in his honor,
every flag now flying at half staff, every kind word spoken
to his memory is a solemn pledge that this will not happen.
Indeed, with the perspective of time his spirit can only grow.
He often
reminded us that for America, the best is yet to come. He should
know, since he will be walking beside us and counseling us
and guiding us to those bright decades and centuries ahead.
All that we must do is listen to his words and heed them. [via
email - remarks given from the Senate Floor]
[6/10/04
Thursday]
[Eric
Hogue - radio talk show host KTKZ -
Sacramento] 5:34 am [link]
The
Battle
Hymn of the Republic: As the President's casket was provided to the
rotunda, my thoughts were directed toward the theme of 'battle'. There are always
new battles, but the same demand upon America is required.
The hymn
played long with emotion, as they had to use the west steps
of the Capitol Building due to construction. The west steps
are longer, higher and harder to climb for the military pallbearers.
A great reminder of endurance, the endurance needed to see
a battle through to the end.
The west
side was also the location that President Reagan chose for
his Inauguration. More people could watch due to the higher
elevation and more of the city of Washington DC could be seen
by the cameras of the media - a city that was returned to its
glory during the Reagan Administration.
How fitting
that this grand hymn was offered for this grand man.
"The
Battle Hymn of the Republic"
Mine eyes
have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord; He is trampling
out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored. He hath
loosed the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword; His
truth is marching on!
[chorus]
Glory! Glory!
Hallelujah! Glory! Glory! Hallelujah! Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
His truth is marching on.
I have seen
Him in the watch-fires of a hundred circling camps; They have
builded Him an altar in the evening dews and damps. I can read
His righteous sentence by the dim and flaring lamps; His day
is marching on!
[chorus]
I have read
a fiery gospel writ in burnished rows of steel; "As ye
deal with my contemners, so with you my grace shall deal; Let
the Hero, born of woman, crush the serpent with his heel, Since
God is marching on."
[chorus]
He has sounded
forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat; He is sifting
out the hearts of men before His judgment-seat; Oh, be swift,
my soul, to answer Him! be jubilant, my feet! Our God is marching
on!
[chorus]
In the beauty
of the lilies Christ was born across the sea, With a glory
in his bosom that transfigures you and me; As he died to make
men holy, let us die to make men free, While God is marching
on.
That last
line again...AS HE DIED TO MAKE MEN HOLY, LET US DIE TO MAKE
MEN FREE!
[6/9/04
Wednesday]
[Bill
Leonard, contributor, Member CA Board of Equalization] 5:05
am |